Skip to main content

Community

Connector Improvement: Historic data becoming false on reload in Fivetran saas/hybrid connections

Answered

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Comments

3 comments

  • Official comment

    Hi Safoora,

    In this workflow is it sufficient to ignore _fivetran_deleted? Or is there some reason you need to disable soft deletes entirely? 

    Hi Eric,

    I don't get notified when comments are added to the feature request. hence, the delay in response. 

    We dont want to ignore all deletes. We want to ignore data which is deleted in source as part of data purging. Like, for some table, purge policy can be 90 days, so data older than 90 days gets deleted.

    We get this delete in fivetran destination also, however we have other layers on top where we recover this data, by applying purge policy to ignore deletes /updates after 90 days.

    However, during resyncs, fivetran marks all existing data as deleted which is problematic

     

    Since, we have this capability in HVR by using restrict refresh, we want the same for saas as well