Connector Improvement: Add channel Column to conversation_time Table in Fivetran Connector
CompletedSubject: Feature Request: Add channel Column to conversation_time Table in Fivetran Connector
Description:
Hi Fivetran Team,
I would like to request a new feature for the Fivetran connector. Specifically, we need to add the channel column to the conversation_time table.
This is the ticket were discussion on this topic was handled : #224868 , please check for further details, this ticket contains a deep explanation on the case and we're advised by Sara (Lead Support Engineer) to raise a new feature request .
Really appreciate your help on this since this is critical for our operations.
Background:
Currently, the channel column is available in a nested form in the API response but is not available in our Fivetran connector. This limitation prevents us from differentiating between values for the same conversation_time_id. The conversation_channel_history table does not have a conversation_time_id column to join, only the conversation_id, which is different.
Proposed Solution:
Sync the channel JSON array in the conversations/{conversation_id}/times endpoint as a CONVERSATION_TIME_CHANNEL table. This table can have both conversation_id and conversation_time_id as primary keys.
Business Impact:
Adding this feature will significantly improve our data integration process by allowing us to accurately track and analyze conversation times across different channels. This enhancement will enable better data-driven decisions and improve our overall operational efficiency.
Thank you for considering this request. Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Best regards,
-
Official comment
Hi Nicolas,
We have added a new table to the connector: CONVERSATION_TIME_CHANNEL. Please see the updated ERD for more details. Let us know if this does not help solve the problem.
Best,
Sadie
-
Hi team, following up on this one since it's an important feature we need to have added . Thanks.
-
Hi team, following up on the resolution of this one , could you please take a look at it ?
Thanks in advance.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
3 comments