Skip to main content

Community

Connector Improvement: Redshift connector dependency on System tables

Answered

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Comments

2 comments

  • Official comment

    Hi Sirkar and Michael,

    Because Redshift doesn’t expose an easy way to log updates, we had to retire our connector. The good news is that with the new Connector SDK, you can now use your knowledge of the data model to track updates directly. If you’d like to explore this approach, here’s a Redshift-specific example to get you started:

    https://github.com/fivetran/fivetran_connector_sdk/tree/main/examples/source_examples/redshift

    Best,

    We also face this issue, where STV_TBL_PERM is a hard requirement for the connector, but this table is only visible to Redshift Superuser, and good security practices do not allow granting Superuser access to a service account for a SaaS data sync product, no matter how well secured it is.  We have proposed some alternate solutions, but they all require development work from the Fivetran side.  Looking forward to having this issue resolved!